Abstract
Tulisan ini memotret perspektif para pemangku kepentingan tentang konsep kota berkelanjutan di dua kota, yaitu Rotterdam dan Jakarta. Kota berkelanjutan sangat menarik diperdebatkan mengingat konsep ini relatif baru diwacanakan oleh para akademisi dan praktisi pembangunan di Indonesia. Konteks pembangunan berkelanjutan yang sejumlah indikatornya harus dipenuhi oleh Indonesia setelah mengadopsi sustainable development goals yang menempatkan kota sebagai salah satu pilar penting untuk mewujudkan keseimbangan antara pertumbuhan ekonomi, kesejahteraan sosial-budaya masyarakat, dan keseimbangan lingkungan akan terpenuhi melalui kota berkelanjutan. Dengan metode kualitatif berupa wawancara, diskusi terfokus, dan pengamatan selama berada di Rotterdam pada bulan Mei 2015. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perspektif pemangku kepentingan tentang ‘kota berkelanjutan’. Hasil yang diperoleh adalah informan menggunakan perspektif yang beragam dalam memaknai ‘kota berkelanjutan’. Hal ini dilatarbelakangi oleh kepentingan dan pemahamannya tentang kota berkelanjutan. Pendekatan governmentality penulis gunakan untuk memahami bagaimana idea dan practices tentang ‘kota berkelanjutan’ muncul dan terimplementasi baik di Rotterdam maupun Jakarta dalam implementasi pembangunan kota berkelanjutan.This article highlights the perspectives of stakeholders about the concept of sustainable city in two cities, Rotterdam and Jakarta. Sustainable city is very interesting to discuss since this concept is relatively new in discussions among scholars and development experts or professionals in Indonesia. Sustainable development concept that Indonesia adopted through the indicators of sustainable development goals which has been endorsed by the world community (United Nations) positioned cities as one of the major pillars in sustainable development for a harmonization of economic growth, social welfare, and the environmental balance will be realized through sustainable cities. Through the qualitative method with depth interview, focus discussion, and observation during the research field in Rotterdam on May 2015, this article aims to analyze the perspectives of the stakeholders about sustainable city. The result of this research is the description of diverse perspectives that had been used by the informants to interpret the concept of ‘sustainable city’. Those are motivated by their interest and understanding of the concept. The approach of governmentality is being used by the author to help to understand how ideas and practices of sustainable city appeared and implemented in Rotterdam and Jakarta.References
Clark. II. Woodrow W, and Russel V, 2010; Sustainable Communities. New York.: Springer.
Drilling, M. (2013). Planning Sustainable Cities: Why Environmental Policy Needs Social Policy.
Isidor Wallimann (ed.). Environmental Policy is Social Policy – Social Policy is Environmental Policy: Toward Sustainability Policy. New York: Springer.
Hassan, A.M. dan Hyowon Lee. (2014). “The paradox of the sustainable city: definitions and examples”. Online journal. Accessed on 20 February 2015.
Heinen, K. (2014). Press release. Rotterdam Partners. 7 April 2014.
Höjer, Mattias, Anders Gullberg, Ronny Pettersson. (2011). Images of the Future City: Time and Space for Sustainable Development. Dordrecht: Springer.
Jenks, M. dan Colin J. (2010). Issues and Concepts. Mike Jenks and Colin Jones (eds.). Dimensions of the Sustainable City. UK: Springer.
Li, T.M. (2007). The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics. London: Duke University Press.
Lundqvist, M. (2007). Sustainable Cities in Theory and Practice: A Comparative Study of Curitiba and Portland. Fakulteten för samhälls- och livsvetenskaper. Karlstad Universitet.
Muluk, S. (2014). Jakarta Menuju Kota yang Berkelanjutan: Analisis Pembangunan Kota Berkelanjutan Dalam Dokumen RPJMD DKI Jakarta Tahun 2013 – 2017. Diakses online inisiatif.org/.../Jakarta-Menuju-Kota-yang-Berkelanjutan_Ipung pdf,
Natter, W. dan Wolfgang Zierhofer. (2002). Political Ecology, Territoriality, and Scale. Geo-Jurnal, 58: 225-231.
Newman, P. and Isabella Jennings. (2008). Cities as Sustainable Ecosystems: Principles and Practices. Washington: Island Press.
Rochecouste, G. and Leonie J.P. (2014). Delivering Resilient, Sustainable Cities is All about People and Place. Leonie J. Pearson, Peter W. Newton, and Peter Roberts (eds.). resilient Sustainable Cities: A Future. New York: Routledge.
Rees, W.E. and Mathis Wackernagel. (1996). Urban Ecological Footprints: Why Cities Cannot Be Sustainable – And Why They are A Key to Sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, (16): 223-248. New York: Elsevier Science Inc.
Rotterdam Climate Initiative (RCI). (2011). Investing in Sustainable Growth. Rotterdam Programme on Sustainability and Climate Change. Rotterdam: Doepel Strijkers Architects.
Satterthwaite, D. (1997). “Sustainable Cities or Cities that Contribute to Sustainable Development?”. Urban Studies, 34(10): 1667-1691
Wardhono, F. dan Hesti N. (2012). Pembangunan Kota Berkelanjutan. Presentasi sebagai bagian dari laporan akhir berjudul “Kajian Upaya Perwujudan Kota Jakarta yang Berkelanjutan”.
Berita online:
http://www.government.nl/issues/environment/roles-and-responsibilities-of-provincial-governmentmunicipal-governments-and-water-authorities. Roles and responsibilities of provincial government, municipal governments and water authorities. Diakses tanggal 25 November 2015.
http://bpiw.pu.go.id/article/detail/kota-berkelanjutan-dinilai-solusi-masa-depan-dalam-menghadapimeningkatnya-urbanisasi. Kota Berkelanjutan Dinilai Solusi Masa Depan dalam Menghadapi Meningkatnya Urbanisasi. Diakses tanggal 22 Agustus 2016.
http://properti.kompas.com/read/2015/02/13/060000621/Jakarta.Sepuluh.Terbawah.Kota.Berkelanjutan.Dunia.
https://www.arcadis.com/en/global/).
http://www.rotterdamelimateinitiative.neluk/city.cited on December 10th, 2015
http//www.pesantren-ciganjur.org ǀ bwiprint.php?id=112